Legal Opinion

Aarstad v. BNSF Railway Company

District Court, D. Montana

Decided April 6, 2020No. 4:17-cv-00072Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION KOREY L. AARSTAD, et al., CV-17-72-GF-BMM-JTJ Plaintiffs, vs. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, et al., RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Korey L. Aarstad, along with 191 other named plaintiffs (collectively “Plaintiffs”), sought an order remanding this case to Montana state court on the basis that the case had been improperly removed from Montana state court based on the local controversy exception to the Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(4)(A). (Doc. 13.)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Marino v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API