Legal Opinion

Markun v. Hillsborough, et al.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided September 17, 1999No. CV-97-208-MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Markun v . Hillsborough, et a l . CV-97-208-M 09/17/99 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Paul R. Markun, Plaintiff v. Civil N o . 97-208-M Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, et a l . , Defendants O R D E R Plaintiff’s claims, as allowed by the Magistrate Judge and approved by the court consist of two basic causes of action: 1 ) a claim against Superintendent James O’Mara, Jr., in his individual capacity, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging deprivation of plaintiff’s clearly established constitutional right not to be punitively transferred from the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. John Furtado v. Harold Bishop, John Furtado v. Harold BishopCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  3. In the Matter of the Application of Lafayette Academy, Inc., Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  4. Ferguson v. Alabama Criminal Justice Information CenterDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API