Legal Opinion

Gul v. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 11, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2024-0787Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RUBINA GUL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:24-cv-00787 (TNM) ANTONY J. BLINKEN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Rubina Gul is a Pakistani citizen who wishes to come here on a tourist visa. But she says the Government refused to issue her one. Instead, it left her application languishing in “administrative processing” for nearly two years. She thus sued a bevy of federal officials, claiming that a decision on her visa has been unreasonably delayed and demanding an answer. Because the Government has, in fact, given her an answer, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  5. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API