Legal Opinion

Cuykendall v. Doe

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 18, 1906PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Cass District Court.— Hon. O. D. Wheeler, Judge. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

On May 3, 1884, the plaintiff, J. Walter Cuykendall, then residing in the state of Delawate and being indebted to the defendant, Nelson R. Doe, made and delivered to said defendant his promissory note or written promise to pay the sum of $150, with interest, on or before *455January 1, 1885. Following said written promise, and as a part of same instrument subscribed by the plaintiff, was the following clause:

And further I do hereby authorize and empower any attorney or prothonotary of any court of record, within the State of Delaware, or elsewhere, to appear for me at the suit of Nelson E. Doe,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. D'Arcy v. KetchumSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  4. Grover & Baker Sewing MacHine Co. v. RadcliffeSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Hall v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fred Andres & Co. v. SchlueterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Monarch Refrigerating Co. v. FaulkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Banco De Sonora v. MoralesArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  4. American Title Insurance Co. v. Stoller Fisheries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  5. Acme Feeds Inc. v. BergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API