Legal Opinion
Garell v. Sterling-Alaska Fur & Game Farms, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Irwin Shapiro, J.
This is a motion by the plaintiffs for summary judgment and for an assessment of damages, all pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice.
In his moving affidavit the plaintiff father says:
“ The facts of the occurrence upon which this suit is brought are as follows:
“ On August 6, 1959 my wife, my two children, including the infant plaintiff, my sister, her child, and I were on vacation touring northern New York. On that day we decided to visit the menagerie operated by the defendant at Lake Placid, New York.
“ The defendant is a domestic corporation organized for profit and operates a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barrett v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Molloy v. . StarinNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Gaccione v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1940
- Stevens v. HulseNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Guzzi v. New York Zoological SocietyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cowden v. Bear Country, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1974