Legal Opinion

Hodge v. United States

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided November 22, 2024No. 3:22-cv-01534Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT OSVALDO HODGE, Petitioner, No. 3:22-cv-1534 (JAM) v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF Petitioner Osvaldo Hodge seeks post-conviction relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He claims that his trial counsel was ineffective when he counseled Hodge to enter a plea of guilty to a federal charge of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances. Because Hodge has failed to plausibly show that his counsel’s representation was deficient or prejudicial, I will deny the motion. BACKGROUND On November…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Dhinsa v. KruegerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  5. Luis Triana v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API