Legal Opinion
Dana Nessel v. AmeriGas Partners
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 27, 2020No. 20-1098PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0092p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT DANA NESSEL, Attorney General of the State of ┐ Michigan, ex rel., The People of the State of │ Michigan, │ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ No. 20-1098 > │ v. │ │ │ AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.; AMERIGAS PROPANE, L.P., │ Defendants-Appellants. │ ┘ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. No. 2:18-cv-13196—Terrence George Berg, District Judge. Decided and Filed: March 27, 2020 Before: CLAY, NALBANDIAN, and MURPHY,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Dana Nessel v. Enbridge Energy, LPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- Adams v. 3M CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
- Banks v. 3M CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
- Bean v. Aristocrat Leisure, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024
- Bean v. SpinX Games, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.