Railroad Co. v. Short
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM HAYWOOD. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Haywood county. — John R. Bond, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil
This action was brought in the court below to recover the value of a bale of cotton belonging to the defendant in error, alleged to have been ignited and destroyed by sparks from one of the plaintiff in error’s engines while the cotton was stored on an open platform near the track.
*715Numerous errors have been assigned by tbe plaintiff 'in error, all of which have been considered and disposed ■of, but only two of them will be noticed in this opinion.
The first of these arises upon the action of his honor, the circuit judge, in his rulings upon certain testimony offered by the defendant in error…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railroad v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Cook v. Champlain Transportation Co.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- Richmond & Danville Railroad v. MedleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
- Burke v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by8 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. FortTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Wyatt v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ShannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Freeman v. NathanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. NantsTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.