Legal Opinion

Stichting Mayflower Mountain Fonds v. City of Park City

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 13, 2011No. 11-4017UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

2Per curiam

This action was filed by Stiehting Mayflower Mountain Fonds and Stiehting Mayflower Recreational Fonds (“Plaintiffs”) against the City of Park City, Utah (“Park City”) and United Park City Mines, Co. (“United Park”) for claims arising out of the annexation by Park City of certain property owned by Stiehting Mayflower and United Park, among others. United Park filed a counterclaim against Plaintiffs for intentional interference with prospective economic relations, malicious interference with business, et al. 1 The district court dismissed Plaintiffs’ complaint on a variety…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Lee v. Max Intern., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. Gross v. General Motors LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tom v. S.B., Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API