Legal Opinion
Capital Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. City of Bismarck
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 2007No. 20060199, 20060270PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Capital Electric Cooperative and Montana-Dakota Utilities Company (“MDU”) both contend they are entitled to provide electric service to certain customers within the City of Bismarck. Capital Electric appeals from a judgment that “denied” its appeal from a Bismarck City Commission decision construing Bismarck’s electric distribution franchises with Capital Electric and with MDU to allow MDU, and not Capital Electric, to provide electric service to new customers in the Boulder Ridge First Addition in northwest Bismarck. MDU appeals from a judgment affirming a Public…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Power Fuels, Inc. v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. City of OmahaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Lire, Inc. v. Bob's Pizza Inn Restaurants, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Fargo, Cass Cty. v. Harwood TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- GO Committee Ex Rel. Hale v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- North Central Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. North Dakota Public Service CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Wieland v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Capital Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. North Dakota Public Service CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- The City of Moorhead v. Bridge CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Minn-Kota Ag Products, Inc. v. N.D. Public Service CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.