Legal Opinion

In re Edwin P.

New York City Family Court

Decided January 31, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Elrich A. Eastman, J.

Respondent moves pursuant to Penal Law § 450.10 (10) to *695preclude property improperly released or alternatively dismissal of the petition or dismissal of count five of the petition, criminal mischief (Penal Law § 145.00 [1]).

Respondent contends that the “notice” of intent to release property prior to the filing of the petition was defective in that respondent had not received counsel prior to the "notice” thereby depriving him of his constitutional right to counsel, his right to confrontation, his right to due process and his right to equal protection;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. GittensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Nicomedes F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. In re KNew York City Family Court · 2005
  3. In re Ali D.New York City Family Court · 1991
  4. In re James C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Matter of KWestchester County Children's Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API