Legal Opinion

In re: Cary Rossi v.

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 20, 2012No. 11-8048Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

By order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, the precedential effect of this decision is limited to the case and parties pursuant to 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8013-1(b). See also 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8010-1(c). File Name: 12b0003n.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT In re: CARY ROSSI, ) DANA ROSSI, ) ) Debtors. ) ______________________________________ ) ) CARY ROSSI, ) DANA ROSSI, ) No. 11-8048 ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) ) JAMES WESTENHOEFER, ) CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE, ) ) Appellee. ) ______________________________________ ) Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Things Remembered, Inc. v. PetrarcaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API