Legal Opinion

Santarsiero v. Green Bay Transport, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1946PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBarlow, J.

Defendant contends that the contract of the Transport Company cannot be enforced because it was not approved by the stockholders as required by the resolution of August 21, 1937; but was in fact repudiated by the stockholders. This position might have some merit if it were not for the fact that the board of directors, consisting of all the stockholders, had full knowledge of the terms and conditions of the contract entered into with the purchaser immediately after it was executed, and at no time prior to 1942 did they object to or in any way disapprove of it so far as the Transport Company is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Indianapolis Rolling Mill v. St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. American Express Co. v. Citizens State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Lindsley v. Farmers Exchange Investment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davies v. MeisenheimerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API