Legal Opinion

In Bar Application of Simmons

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 2018No. 201,671-5PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYu, J.

¶ 1 Determining moral character as a credential for practicing law has a long and intriguing history. 1 While lawyers may have more work to do in regard to how the public perceives our contributions to society, the evaluation of a bar applicant's character is an important step toward building confidence in our legal profession and our system of justice.

¶ 2 At this point in time, every state bar has some form of certification of moral character as part of its admission process. See NAT'L CONFERENCE OF BAR EXAM'S &

AM. BAR ASS'N SECTION OF LEGAL EDUC. AND ADMISSIONS TO BAR, COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. In Re BelsherWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In Re WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re Petition of SimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. ISB v. John DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  2. In re Bar Application of StevensWashington Supreme Court · 2022
  3. In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against WallstromWashington Supreme Court · 2025
  4. In re Pers. Restraint of LewisWashington Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API