Legal Opinion

McClamma v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 9, 2014No. 2D12-3523PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALTENBERND, Judge.

Alexander W. McClamma appeals his judgments and orders of probation entered as a result of a negotiated plea after the denial of his dispositive motion to suppress. We reverse. Mr. McClamma’s case demonstrates that a valid arrest for loitering or prowling typically occurs in combination with a Terry1 stop for a crime that is occurring or is about to occur. But loitering or prowling is not the crime of attempting to commit some other crime. Under the modern statute, a defendant must intentionally commit conduct that the defendant knew or with substantial certainty should have…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. State v. EckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  4. Palmer v. City of EuclidSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. D.A. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ellis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Benny Saintil v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API