Legal Opinion
First Interstate Bank v. National Bank & Trust Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 18, 1989No. Civ. Nos. 88-558-FR, 88-559-FRPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*187OPINION
FRYE, District Judge:
The matter before the court is the motion of defendant The National Bank and Trust Company of Norwich, N.A. (Norwich) to compel plaintiff Margaret M. Hood to respond to certain discovery requests (# 84).
BACKGROUND
This motion concerns one of two consolidated actions arising from the attempts of Hood to transfer trusteeship of two testamentary and two inter vivos trusts from Norwich to First Interstate Bank of Oregon. This court has considered numerous motions in these cases. To avoid duplication, this opinion will set out only the facts pertinent to the pending…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hoenig v. WestphalNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Woosley v. DunningOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Reisch v. J & L Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Frosty v. Textron, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1995
- United States v. Premises Known As 281 Syosset Woodbury RoadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Premises Known As 281 Syosset Woodbury Road, Woodbury, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Frosty v. Textron, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1995