Hunter v. Klauber

As the appellant points out in his brief, the report in this case does not conform with the model set out in Rule 45 *184of the District Courts. Although strict compliance with the model is not required, it is suggested that substantial compliance with it would insure against a report being returned to the trial judge for correction because it lacked any of the required material.

The report does not state what kind of an action is involved but we feel that it is permissible for this Court to infer from the entire instrument that the case involves an action of contract in two counts — the first…