Legal Opinion
In re Abdemur
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.
Decided June 12, 2018No. Case No.: 17-16875-LMIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Laurel M. Isicoff, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge
THIS CAUSE came before me on February 14, 2018, on Motion of Toyota Lease Trust ("Toyota") for an Order Confirming the Automatic Stay is not in Effect Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 365(p)(2)(B) (ECF # 49) ("Toyota's Motion"). Because of issues that arose between Abraham Abdemur (the "Debtor") and Toyota during the course of crafting what was supposed to be an agreed order, I am now required to resolve whether the safeguards contained within 11 U.S.C. § 524 must be satisfied when a debtor assumes a lease pursuant to subsection 365(p) in order…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- South Motor Co. v. Carter-Pritchett-Hodges, Inc. (In Re MMH Automotive Group, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2008
- In Re MortensenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- In Re CreightonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Melissa Mather Bobka v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Kevin AndersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Melissa Mather Bobka v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020