Legal Opinion
Mazzucco v. Eastman
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 24, 1960PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCharles M. Hughes, J.
The plaintiffs have brought an action to recover possession of a parcel of land allegedly wrongfully enclosed by the defendants’ fence, together with damages for withholding the same.
The proof upon the trial revealed that the plaintiffs are the record owners of a parcel described as Lot 101 and the westerly 10 feet of Lot 100 as shown on a map of Grove Park in the Town of Rotterdam, dated May 20, 1914, and made by L. B. Sebring, C. E., and filed in the Schenectady County Clerk’s office. The lot described in plaintiffs’ deed is 45 feet in width and 115 feet in depth. The lot fronts on a street…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Quigg v. TreadwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Erie Railroad v. KaplowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1954
- McMahon v. MorseNew York Supreme Court · 1929
- Wessel v. CramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- People v. . the Chateaugay Ore and Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Withington v. DerrickSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Baer v. Town of WaterfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Mazzucco v. EastmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Lewis v. BerleueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Gillette v. HoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.