Bray v. Miles
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Hendricks Circuit Court.
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion.
Wiley, J. —
I am unable to concur in the conclusions reached as announced in the prevailing opinion. To sustain that conclusion, a construction must be given to the will of John Miles, which, in my judgment, is so foreign to the manifest intention of the testator, as expressed by the entire will, that violence is done to such intention and object of the testator, and his estate, in part at least, is diverted from the purpose and channel plainly expressed. To hold that appellant, under subdivision twelve of the will, is entitled to share that part of the residue of the estate…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Smith T. v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Ould v. Washington Hospital for FoundlingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Scott v. . GuernseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Sewall v. RobertsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.