Legal Opinion

Herndon v. J. T. Robison Commissioner of General Land Office

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1925No. 4061PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge STAYTON

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

Gilbert Herndon sues for a writ of mandamus to cancel a sale of some school land and to compel the Commissioner to reinstate him 'as purchaser. His claim, he admits, has been forfeited on account -of non-payment of interest. After the forfeiture and more than a i year before the filing of his suit, the tract, having been again placed ■. upon the market, was sold and awarded to respondent Wooten, but the proceedings precedent were illegal and the award was therefore invalid, as was pointed out in the similar case of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Erp v. TillmanTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Harvey v. CummingsTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Weaver v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Ransome v. BeardenTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Erp v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Callahan v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Caples v. ColeTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Lovett v. SimmonsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  5. Skaggs v. Grisham-Hunter Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API