Legal Opinion
State v. Puig
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 18, 1975No. 2 CA-CR 508PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRUCKER, Judge.
Appellant. raises three questions on appeal. First, was the initial stop of his vehicle improper? Second, was the search of the trunk of his car improper? Third, did the trial court err in its failure to dismiss the indictment for lack of a speedy trial ? Having reviewed the record, we conclude that the failure to grant the motion to suppress was error.
At the evidentiary hearing on the motion to suppress, Arizona Highway Patrolman William Rogers was the only witness to testify. The facts revealed by his testimony are as follows. On May 8, 1974, at 6:45 p. m., appellant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden v. William Eugene PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Morris Paul Leal and Morton Ritchie LealCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. PuigArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- State v. PuigCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975