Legal Opinion

Isom v. Isom

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 8, 1943No. 15,091PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

The correct explanation of the peculiar condition in which this case comes before us is doubtless the fact that plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, who is not an attorney, represents herself, perhaps relying upon her long experience in this and collateral litigation. Isom v. Isom, 101 Colo. 368, 73 P. (2d) 1408; Isom v. Isom, 101 Colo. 532, 74 P. (2d) 1245. It will thus be observed that such litigation has been in progress for something like ten years. All this is pertinent to the specification of points before us.

The immediate occasion for the present writ was an order…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  2. Isom v. IsomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  3. Isom v. IsomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. H. O. Aaberg v. District Court of Gunnison CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API