Legal Opinion

McKnight v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 18, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Mower county, Farmer, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after a verdict of $300 for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

.Dickinson, J.

The plaintiff, while engaged in the serviee of the defendant as a brak'eman on one of its freight trains, and while coupling a locomotive to one of the defendant’s stock-cars, had his hand caught between the draught-iron on the ear and that on the locomotive. For the injury thus caused he recovered a verdict in this action. This is an appeal from an' order refusing a new trial. The plaintiff ascribes the injury to three causes: First, a defect in the draught-iron or draw-head of the car; second, a defective condition of the engine; and, third, negligence in the operation of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Torske v. Commonwealth Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Kolbe v. BoyleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Fruit Dispatch Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API