Thomas v. E. G. Curtis Sons Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLET, District Judge.
The liability which the receiver is endeavoring to enforce in this cause is grounded upon the accommodation indorsement of E. G. Curtis Sons Company, a dissolved Michigan corporation. The hank knew that it was an accommodation indorsement.
Section 10 (i) of Act No. 327 of Michigan Public Acts of 1931 reads as follows: “Every corporation, unless otherwise provided, or inconsistent with the act under which a particular corporation is or shall have been formed, shall have power: * * * to guarantee, purchase, hold, sell, assign, transfer, mortgage, pledge or otherwise…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Farmers & Mechanics' Bank v. Butchers & Drovers' BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Monument National Bank v. Globe WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Martin v. Niagara Falls Paper Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Swift v. Smith, Dixon & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
- Holmes v. . WillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Eastern Trust & Banking Co. v. GuernseySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949