Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Sullen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 30, 1982No. 80-279PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (Metropolitan), defendant below, appeals from a judgment awarding $13,090.30 to plaintiffs, beneficiaries under an accidental death policy issued by Metropolitan. Because the plaintiffs are children and grandchildren of the insured deceased, Roosevelt Sullen, Sr., we will refer to them as the Sullens. The basis of Metropolitan's appeal is that the trial court erred in refusing to allow Metropolitan to amend its answer during trial and in denying several of its requested jury instructions. We find that the trial court committed no reversible error in these…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Dist. & Chem. v. American Laubscher Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Government Street Lumber Co. v. AmSouth Bank, NASupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Harkins & Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Arfor-Brynfield, Inc. v. Huntsville Mall AssociatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Robinson v. KierceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API