Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dixon v. Hot Shot Express, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 5, 2010No. 1070960Published

1ConcurrenceLyons, Justice

I concur fully in the main opinion. I write specially to note the distinction between this case and this Court’s decision in Weatherspoon v. Tillery Body Shop, Inc., 44 So.3d 447 (Ala.2010). In Weatherspoon, the trial court dismissed the plaintiffs claims against the defendant, a motor carrier of propei’ty, because the claims were preempted under the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 and the ICC Termination Act of 1995, 49 U.S.C. § 14501(c). Based on the language of § 14501(c)(1), which provides: “a State, [or] political subdivision of a State, ... may not enact or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weatherspoon v. Tillery Body Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API