Davis v. Lambert
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Nemaha county: John 1 s. Stull, District Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Ames, C.
This is an action upon a promissory note. The defense is a denial that the purported signature of the defendant, who is admittedly hound, if .at all, only as surety, is genuine. On the trial a great many witnesses on both sides testified as experts concerning the genuineness of the disputed signature, a large numerical majority of them favoring the contention of the defendant. At the instance of the plaintiff the court gave to the jury the following instruction which Avas excepted to.
“You are instructed that the evidence as to the genuineness of handAvriting is generally regarded as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hayden v. FredericksonNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by2 opinions
- Culavin v. O'ConnorNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
- Kleutsch v. Security Mutual Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1904