Legal Opinion
TIDMAN v. EMINENCE HARDSCAPES LLC
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 3, 2023No. 1:22-cv-05441Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE MARK H. TIDMAN, Plaintiff, Civil No. 22-5441 (RMB-AMD) v. EMINENCE HARDSCAPES, LLC, et OPINION al., Defendants. RENÉE MARIE BUMB, Chief United States District Judge: This matter comes before the Court upon the filing of a Motion for Default Judgment by pro se Plaintiff Mark H. Tidman (“Plaintiff”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2). [Docket No. 14.] Plaintiff seeks a judgment of default as to Defendants Eminence Hardscapes, LLC (“Eminence”), Anthony DiMatteo (“DiMatteo”), FS Swimming Pools,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Robin Chamberlain v. Vincent C. Giampapa, M.D., Individually and Dba Plastic Surgery Center InternationaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Hritz v. Woma Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.