Legal Opinion · Dissent

Afoa v. Port of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 2018No. 94525-0Published

1Dissent

STEPHENS, J. (dissenting)

¶ 48 In our first appeal in this case, we stated, "The Port [of Seattle] is the only entity with sufficient supervisory and coordinating authority to ensure safety in this complex, multiemployer work site. If the Port does not keep Sea-Tac Airport safe for workers, it is difficult to imagine who will." Afoa v. Port of Seattle, 176 Wash.2d 460, 479, 296 P.3d 800 (2013) ( AfoaI ). A jury subsequently found that the Port retained a right of control over Brandon Afoa's work conditions at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac Airport), giving rise to a nondelegable…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Howard S. Wright Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Stute v. P.B.M.C., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Moss v. VadmanWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Kamla v. the Space Needle CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Kamla v. Space Needle Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API