Jacobson v. Peiser

Plaintiff made a motion for a bill of particulars returnable April 24, 1933. The defendant did not raise substantive objections to the motion at that time, but alleged in his opposing affidavit that “ there are numerous and substantial objections to the particular items requested which, leave is requested, be not discussed until the plaintiff present sufficient proof to entitle him to the granting of the order.” The motion was granted in toto.

The defendant now moves for reargument and for resettlement of the order made and entered the 8th day of May, 1933. Defendant objects to items 1, 5, 9,…