Legal Opinion
Smithers v. Mettert
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 30, 1987No. 33A01-8703-CV-00060PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Chief Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Roger Smithers appeals from the Henry Circuit Court the denial of his motion for payment of insurance proceeds through proceedings supplemental. We reverse.
FACTS
On April 25, 1979, a car owned and operated by James C. Mettert (Mettert) swerved off the road and flipped over. Three passengers were in the car with Met-tert: Mary Daffron, Jack Duffy, and Roger Smithers (Smithers). Smithers was injured. Mettert was insured by Milwaukee Insurance Company (Milwaukee) under an automobile liability insurance contract that contained standard conditions for…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miller v. DiltsIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Kelso v. KelsoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Van Orman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. v. Johnson, Admrx.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- Gulf Insurance Company v. VelaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. BrekkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co. v. Chandler Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Gallant Insurance v. WilkersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Rose v. Royal InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Lynette C.California Court of Appeal · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.