Legal Opinion

Coonan v. Commanding Officer

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided June 29, 1972No. Civ. A. No. 72-C-162PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

REYNOLDS, District Judge.

■ Petitioner, a member of the Army Reserves, has petitioned this court under Title 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for a writ of habeas corpus. He contends that his application for a conscientious objector discharge was erroneously denied by the Army. I agree.

*1282On December 3, 1970, Coonan applied for. a conscientious objector discharge from the Army. Subsequently this application was forwarded to the Army’s Conscientious Objector Review Board for evaluation and recommendation. The Board concluded as follows:

“The Board unanimously believed that PVT Coonan’s alleged…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States ex rel. Conrad v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walter C. Royal v. Superior Court of New Hampshire, Rockinghan CountyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API