Legal Opinion

State v. Van Horn

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 12, 1956No. 44901PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOHLING,- Commissioner.

John W. Van Horn appeals from a judgT ment imposing a sentence of five years imprisonment for robbery in the first degree. He claims error was committed in the refusal of an instruction and that.certain remarks of the court constituted prejudicial comment on the evidence.

The sufficiency of the evidence is not questioned. It established that about 3:30 a. m. January 24, .1954, defendant and Wayne Whitt drove into the Arro-Gas service station on old Highway 99 in St. Louis county, Missouri, in Whitt’s 1952 Studebaker coupe automobile, and that Van Horn entered the station…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. HydeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. State v. BradleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. State v. FraleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  4. State v. BroderickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  5. State v. GabrielSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. State v. BartonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  4. State v. ChamineakSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API