Legal Opinion
State v. Sanford
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1916No. 13054PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered May 8, 1915, upon a trial and conviction of practicing medicine without a license.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The appellant was convicted of the offense of practicing medicine without a license. The questions suggested for reversal are all based upon the information, which, omitting the caption and conclusion, reads as follows:
“I, John F. Murphy, prosecuting attorney in and for the county of King, state of Washington, come now here in the name of and by the authority of the state of Washington, and by this information do accuse H. L. Sanford of the crime of practicing medicine without a license, committed as follows, to wit:
“He, said H. L. Sanford, in the county of King and state of Washington, on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. . CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- State v. FlandersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- State v. . DardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- State v. ComingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- State v. HaskellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1884
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. VerbonWashington Supreme Court · 1932