Sample v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hancock Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The appellant was prosecuted for. maliciously injuring property. After laying the venue, it is charged in the affidavit that, on a date mentioned, the defendant did “unlawfully and maliciously injure a certain milch cow, the property of Ira Bevil then and there being, .and there unlawfully and maliciously running, striking and beating said cow with a whip, stick and club,” etc.
The appellant insists that the gravamen of the charge is, that the cow was “ unlawfully and maliciously running,” etc. "We think, however, that the fair import of the charge is, that the defendant injured the cow, by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dodd v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Kinsman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- State v. SparksIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- State v. PitzerIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cornett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Barber v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
- Maez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. McKeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Cornett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.