Legal Opinion

Hull v. Ruggles

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1873PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL, by the defendants, from a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Mullin, P. J.

The plaintiff is a manufacturer of candies, at Syracuse. The. defendants are dealers therein, at Seneca Palis. On the 27th day of July, 1871, the defendants ordered of the plaintiff’s agent 300 packages of candy and 60 pieces of silver ware to be delivered forthwith, at their place of business. The candy was put up in small packages, and in 60 of the number was put a ticket on which was marked the name of one of the articles of silver ware; and a purchaser who bought a package containing one of these tickets was entitled to a piece of silver ware named therein.

The…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Governors of the Almshouse of New York v. . Am. Art UnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. State v. BoneilSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API