Legal Opinion

Lang v. Marro

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided August 17, 1962No. File No. CV 2-613-3335PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff sues to recover the balance due for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for the plaintiff the defendant appeals. The appeal has been submitted by both parties on their briefs without argument.

Neither the plaintiff nor the defendant made any request that stenographic notes of the proceedings be made pursuant to Circuit Court Rule 4.5.1. At the trial, the parties were offered the opportunity to comply with Rule 4.5.1, and both parties declined the opportunity and waived the attendance of a reporter. Thus there was no transcript of the evidence.

The defendant's assignments of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LounsburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1963
  2. State v. TobeyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1964
  3. E. M. Workman Co. v. HarrisonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1966
  4. Hamilton Standard Federal Credit Union v. MaturoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API