Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. South Dakota Game & Fish Commission v. O'Neill

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1934No. File No. 7679PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPolley, J.

This is an original action instituted by the state game and fish commission to restrain the defendants, Custer State Park Board, the state auditor, and state treasurer, from’ expending and paying out of the state game fund money in excess of $12,000 to be expended in Custer State Park for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1934.

At and for some time prior to the adoption of the Revised Code of 1919, the state game and fish commission consisted of the Governor, Attorney General, and state game warden (sections 10431-10445). This board as so constituted continued tO’ exist until the adoption of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foutch v. ZempelIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Rowenhorst v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Henry v. Meade County Bank of SturgisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Northwestern Loan & Banking Co. v. JonasenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re the Termination of the Franchise Agreement Between Groseth International, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Stumes v. DelanoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Tubbs v. LinnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. McFarland v. KeenanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Becker v. BuderDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API