Legal Opinion

Moore v. City of Kalamazoo

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1896PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo; Buck, J. Case by Abbie Moore against the city of Kalamazoo for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment for $4,500 in favor of the plaintiff, who complained of an injury to her knee, crippling her permanently, suffered by reason of the defendant’s sidewalk. The brief filed by counsel for the defendant does not discuss the assignments of error seriatim, and we shall therefore deal with the questions discussed, rather than specific assignments.

Evidence tending to show that there were other defects in the immediate vicinity has so often been held admissible as bearing upon the question of notice that ,we think it unnecessary to cite authorities, especially as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reed v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Lombar v. Village (Mich. 5-8-1891)Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Corcoran v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Canfield v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Heather Lynn Hannay v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Pacific Coast Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Larned v. VanderlindeMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Stynes v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API