Legal Opinion

Sam Yeung Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 1, 1964No. Reap. Dec. 10760; Entry Nos. 1052658; 708543PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

These two appeals for reappraisement were consolidated for purposes of trial. The merchandise is water chestnuts, both whole and sliced, imported from Hong Kong.

Both parties asserted on trial that rule 15 statements were filed, but such statements are not of record. However, counsel also stated that these water chestnuts were appraised on the basis of export value, which is the same basis as that which plaintiff claims. There is no issue, therefore, as to basis of appraisement. As to the amount of export value, counsel for plaintiff stated the issue as follows, and counsel for…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. C. S. Emery & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  2. Sam Yeung Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API