Legal Opinion

State v. J. M. Huber Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1947No. A-893PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hickman

Under our view of the controlling question presented for decision in this court, a brief statement of the case is all that is required. This is an action by the1 State against Continental Oil Company and J. M. Huber Corporation to recover $58,240.00 alleged to be due as annual payments of $2.00 per acre under the terms of an oil and gas lease executed under the provisions of Ch. 140 of the Acts of the 39th Legislature, 1925, amending sub-section 2 of Sec. 7, Ch. 83 of the Acts of the 35th Legislature, 1917, Art. 5344, V. C. S., relating to the prospecting for, and the development of minerals…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grayburg Oil Co. v. Giles, Comr.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State v. Huber CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Oil Field Haulers Ass'n v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Davis v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. First State Bank of Bedford v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. American Transfer & Storage Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Security Savings Ass'n v. Clifton, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API