Legal Opinion

Walmart Stores East, Lp v. Leverette

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 24, 2025No. S24G1104PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

321 Ga. 854

FINAL COPY S24G1104. WALMART STORES EAST, LP v. LEVERETTE. PINSON, Justice. At common law, juries would routinely award “nominal dam- ages” to a plaintiff who proved the violation of her legal rights but failed to prove any amount of actual damages with enough certainty. These nominal damages were widely understood to be only a “trivial sum,” important for the fact of the award but not meaningful as an amount. In England, that sum was often a shilling (equivalent to 12 pennies), and after nominal damages traveled across the Atlantic, that sum was first a few pennies, and later,…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Uzuegbunam v. PreczewskiSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  3. Ponce De Leon Condominiums v. DiGirolamoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Haynes v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Parker v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1845

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Green Plains Trade Group v. Archer Daniels Midland Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2026
  2. Guy v. Housing Authority of the City of AugustaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2025
  3. Georgia Bone & Joint Surgeons, P.C. v. KeelSupreme Court of Georgia · 2026
  4. Green Plains Trade Group v. Archer Daniels Midland Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2026
  5. Walmart Stores East, Lp v. Bettie LeveretteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API