Legal Opinion

Guggenheimer v. Southern Seminary, Inc.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 15, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWest, J.

This is an action by S. E. Guggenheimer against Southern Seminary, Incorporated, and R. L. Durham to recover damages for an alleged malicious prosecution.

*141Guggenheimer was arrested and prosecuted under a warrant sworn out by Durham before the mayor of the city of Buena Yista, charging that Guggenheimer did, on the 24th day of May, 1921, “unlawfully and feloniously, illegally seize, take and secrete a certain child, namely, Ruth Hanks, from the person, to-wit, Southern Seminary, Incorporated, having lawful charge of such child, the said Guggenheimer being then and there neither the father nor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. KlaffSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  2. Taylor v. Sutherlin-Meade Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1908
  3. Board of Commissioners v. DorsettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Evans v. MichaelsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  2. Gresham v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  3. Payne v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API