Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Brandon
Texas Supreme Court
Decided March 2, 1932No. 5821PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pierson
In the application for Writ of error the question presented for determination is thus stated:
“There is but one question involved in this suit; that is, whether the provision of the Charter of the City of Dallas, providing that the lien of any assessment shall relate back and become effective as of the date of the resolution ordering the paving, is constitutional. -If it - is, then the lien of the plaintiffs in error dates from the 18th day of July, 1924, prior to the time when Anderson established his homestead upon the property. If it is not, then the defendants in error have no lien because…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Beaumont v. FallTexas Supreme Court · 1927
- Brown v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- Arthur v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Baugh v. City of LaGrangeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Hester v. Collector of TaxesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wise v. PenaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Falkner v. Memorial Gardens AssociationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- City of Corpus Christi Ex Rel. Harris v. FlatoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Claxton v. BrandonTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- West Texas Const. Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.