Legal Opinion

Nealon v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 2000No. 77250PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James M. Porter, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Daniel Nealon appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendant-appellee city of Cleveland on his claim that the city breached his employment contract to join the Law Department of the city. Plaintiff claims that material issues of disputed fact precluded granting of summary judgment. We find no error and affirm.

On March 10, 1998, former Chief Assistant Director of Law for the Labor and Employment Law Section of the city, Joseph Jerse, interviewed plaintiff for the position of Assistant Director of Law in that section. At the time,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gessner v. City of UnionOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Krickler v. City of BrooklynOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Stewart v. Everyware Global, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
  4. Brainard v. City of ToledoLucas County Court of Common Pleas · 2001
  5. Koval v. Dow Jones & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API