G.S. v. State

We reverse the trial court’s adjudication of delinquency and remand with directions to discharge G.S. The trial court’s determination that G.S. committed grand theft was erroneous because the only evidence introduced at trial to support the charge was based on hearsay. See Molina v. State, 406 So.2d 57 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Postell v. State, 398 So.2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 411 So.2d 384 (Fla.1981); see also Smart v. State, 274 So.2d 577 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973).

We also agree that G.S. could not have been convicted of possession of a motor vehicle with a missing VIN number in violation of…