Jones v. City of Ridgeland
Mississippi Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceWaller, Chief Justice
¶ 33. By striking down the three-court rule as a violation of separation of powers, the majority asserts that this Court — not the Legislature — dictates the right to ap*542peal. According to the majority, this Court has the power to determine its own jurisdiction. I believe that such a concept is foreign to our Constitution and to our laws.
¶ 34. Though I agree that Jones’s conviction and sentence should be affirmed, I strongly disagree with the majority’s treatment of Section 11-51-81 of the Mississippi Code, also known as the three-court rule. Miss.Code Ann. § 11-51-81 (Rev. 2002). First of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Newell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.