Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Jones v. City of Ridgeland

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 2010No. 2009-CT-00984-SCTPublished

1ConcurrenceWaller, Chief Justice

¶ 33. By striking down the three-court rule as a violation of separation of powers, the majority asserts that this Court — not the Legislature — dictates the right to ap*542peal. According to the majority, this Court has the power to determine its own jurisdiction. I believe that such a concept is foreign to our Constitution and to our laws.

¶ 34. Though I agree that Jones’s conviction and sentence should be affirmed, I strongly disagree with the majority’s treatment of Section 11-51-81 of the Mississippi Code, also known as the three-court rule. Miss.Code Ann. § 11-51-81 (Rev. 2002). First of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Newell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API