Greenwood v. State

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence, finding that the trial court did not err in failing to conduct a proper Nelson1 inquiry because appellant neither made an unequivocal request to discharge the court appointed counsel, nor stated that ineompetency was the basis for his unhappiness with counsel. See Woody v. State, 698 So.2d 391, 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Moreover, appellant proceeded to trial with his counsel and made no attempt to dismiss him or request self-representation. See Davis v. State, 703 So.2d 1055, 1058-59 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, 524…