Seypar, Inc. v. Water & Sewer District No. 363
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson
¶1 Plaintiff Seypar, Inc. (Seypar), appeals from a May 9,1995 Summary Judgment Order issued by the Fifth Judicial District Court, Madison County, holding that Defendant Water and Sewer District No. 363 (the District) had legal authority to assess a $500 sewer hook-up inspection fee for each of Seypar’s 70 condominium units as well as the court’s January 6,1997 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and January 30, 1997 Judgment holding that the amount of the fee was reasonable. We affirm.
¶2 Seypar raises the following issues on appeal:
¶3 1. Did the District Court err when it concluded, as a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Daines v. KnightMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- Werre v. DavidMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Hagan v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- Dean v. Austin Mutual InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- Montana Public Employee's Ass'n v. Montana Department of TransportationMontana Supreme Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Raymond W. George TrustMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Thompson v. Crow Tribe of IndiansMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Eastgate Village Water and Sewer Ass'n v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Brown v. Signal Peak Energy, LLCDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2023